home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1993-04-06 | 163.9 KB | 4,028 lines |
-
-
-
- INTERNET DRAFT Expires August 27, 1993
-
-
-
- ISO/CCITT and Internet Management Coexistence (IIMC):
-
- Translation of ISO/CCITT GDMO MIBs to Internet MIBs
-
- (IIMCOMIBTRANS)
-
-
- March 26, 1993
-
-
- Owen Newnan (Editor)
-
- U S WEST Advanced Technologies
- 4001 Discovery Lane, Suite 190
- Boulder, Colorado 80303
- onewnan@atqm.advtech.uswest.com
-
-
-
- Status of this Memo
-
- This document provides information to the network and
- systems management community. This document is intended as
- a contribution to ongoing work in the area of multi-protocol
- management coexistence and interworking. This document is
- part of a package; see also [IIMCIMIBTRANS] [IIMCMIB-II]
- [IIMCPROXY] and [IIMCSEC]. Distribution of this document is
- unlimited. Comments should be sent to the Network Management
- Forum IIMC working group (iimc@thumper.bellcore.com).
-
- This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are
- working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force
- (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other
- groups may also distribute working documents as Internet
- Drafts.
-
- Internet Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of
- six months. Internet Drafts may be updated, replaced, or
- obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is not
- appropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference material or
- to cite them other than as a ``working draft'' or ``work in
- progress.''
-
- Please check the 1id-abstracts.txt listing contained in the
- internet-drafts Shadow Directories on nic.ddn.mil,
- nnsc.nsf.net, nic.nordu.net, ftp.nisc.sri.com, munnari.oz.au
- to learn the current status of any Internet Draft.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page i
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
-
- Abstract
-
- This document is intended to facilitate the use of ISO/CCITT
- MIBs for integrated management of networks via proxy
- management of TCP/IP networks that are managed using SNMP.
- This document provides heuristic procedures that translate
- managed object specifications from ISO/CCITT Guidelines for
- Definition of Managed Object (GDMO) templates to Internet
- MIB macros. Currently, some market segments demand SNMP for
- customer network management, while others require the
- ISO/CCITT Common Management Information Protocol (CMIP).
- The approach defined in this document accommodates both,
- protecting investment already made in management information
- specifications and minimizing cost to implement a second
- protocol where the market requires. This translation is
- designed to: lose as little functionality as possible in
- translation; minimize need for human involvement during
- translation; minimize cost to implement dual protocol and
- proxy-based applications; and support generic network models
- that span many computer platforms and network elements.
- This document in intended to encourage standardization of
- such an approach and promote consistent usage of MIB
- definitions, independent of protocol.
-
- Table of Contents
-
- Status of this Memo ......................................i
- Revision History .........................................iii
- 1. Introduction ..........................................1
- 1.1 Background ...........................................1
- 1.2 Overview .............................................2
- 1.3 Scope ................................................4
- 1.4 Terms and Conventions ................................6
- 2. Translation Procedures ................................6
- 2.1 Relationship to RFC 1212 .............................6
- 2.2 Mapping of Managed Object Classes and Attributes .....7
- 2.3 Mapping to the SYNTAX clause .........................15
- 2.4 Generation of Internet MIB Identifiers ...............18
- 2.5 Mapping to the ACCESS clause .........................21
- 2.6 Mapping to the STATUS clause .........................21
- 2.7 Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause ....................22
- 2.8 Mapping to the REFERENCE clause ......................22
- 2.9 Mapping to the INDEX clause ..........................23
- 2.10 Mapping to the DEFVAL clause ........................23
- 2.11 Mapping of Actions ..................................23
- 2.12 Translation of Notifications ........................24
- 2.13 Mapping of Delete Operations ........................27
- 2.14 Translation of Create Operations ....................28
- 3. Constraints on SNMP Usage .............................29
- 4. Summary ...............................................31
- 5. Acknowledgments .......................................32
- Appendix A Abridged Example ..............................36
- Appendix B Abridged ISO/CCITT Compatibility MIB ..........46
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page ii
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
-
- Revision History
-
- Draft 0 - October 9, 1992
- Initial draft of this document.
-
- Draft 1 - March 26, 1993
- Current draft of this document (replaces Draft 0).
-
- Major Changes Since Last Revision
-
- At the IIMC meeting of February 8-9, 1993, the editor was
- instructed to make revisions and supply proposed text in
- certain areas for the next draft of this document. Those
- changes have been applied to Draft 0 in arriving at this
- draft (Draft 1). Following is a summary of the edits
- applied:
-
- 1. Auto-registry of generated ASN.1 Modules was added
- to translation of notifications.
- 2. Index Usage in Translated MIBs was clarified.
- 3. An algorithm is provided for mapping notifications
- to traps and Appendix B is largely rewritten to
- provide the example output, derived from ISO 10165-
- 2 (DMI). In the process, several miscellaneous
- errors were corrected.
- 4. The "OSI Compatibility MIB" was renamed "ISO/CCITT
- Convergence MIB". (Alignment with the name of the
- ISO/CCITT Proxy MIB should also be considered).
- 5. Objectives have been clarified to indicate that
- SNMPv2 is in the scope of the first Issue of this
- document, and pragmas are not.
- 6. Machine Readable Conventions for REFERENCE Values
- have been specified to facilitate mechanized
- translation.
- 7. Translating the attributes of ISO/CCITT Top have
- been clarified. The NAME BINDING table provides the
- only attribute of Top that appears to be needed.
-
- Action Item Proposals Contained In This Document
-
- #19 Current Issues List
-
- Outstanding Issues
-
- The following actions were identified at the February IIMC
- meeting, but have not yet been addressed in this draft.
- Proposals in these areas would be most welcome.
-
- #21 A More Extensive Example for Appendix A.
- #20 Add support for SNMPv2.
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page iii
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 1.Introduction
-
- The past decade has witnessed the development of enterprise
- wide networks composed of a multi-vendor environment
- containing heterogeneous protocol and hardware suites.
- Organizations have become increasingly dependent on these
- enterprise networks for their daily operations. This
- dependence has focused attention on the need for operation,
- administration, maintenance, and provisioning (OAM&P) of the
- multi-vendor enterprise network on an end-to-end basis.
-
- 1.1 Background
-
- This document is part of a package of ISO/CCITT and Internet
- Management Coexistence (IIMC) drafts. Other documents
- included in this package are:
-
- [IIMCIMIBTRANS] Translation of Internet MIBs to
- ISO/CCITT GDMO MIBs
-
- [IIMCMIB-II] Translation of Internet MIB-II(RFC 1213)
- to ISO/CCITT GDMO MIB
-
- [IIMCSEC] ISO/CCITT to Internet Management
- Security
-
- [IIMCPROXY] ISO/CCITT to Internet Management Proxy
-
- These documents together comprise a package aimed at
- integrating ISO/CCITT-based and Internet-based management
- systems. These documents represent coexistence and
- interworking efforts underway within the IIMC working group,
- chartered under the auspices of the Network Management Forum
- Architecture Integration ISO/Internet technical team.
-
- This work was initiated, in part, by NM Forum efforts to
- translate RFC 1214 for use with OMNIPoint 1 implementations.
- Through this effort, it became obvious that end-to-end
- management requires an integrated, unified view of the
- managed network, despite differences in management protocol
- and information structure. Integrated management can be
- facilitated by the development of "proxy" mechanisms which
- translate between functionally equivalent service, protocol,
- and SMI differences to create this unified view. MIB
- translation procedures can be used to support proxy
- management, as well as to take advantage of existing MIB
- definition and avoid duplication of effort. In this way,
- commercial investment in both ISO/CCITT and Internet-based
- management technologies can be preserved through deployment
- of common methods and tools which support integration.
-
- This overall strategy was outlined in a joint publication
- developed by the NM Forum and X/Open entitled "ISO/CCITT and
- Internet Management: Coexistence and Interworking Strategy"
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 1
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- [NMFMC92]. The documents included in the IIMC package are
- the next level of detailed specifications which implement
- several of the methodologies identified in the strategy.
-
- 1.2 Overview
-
- The response to the need for OAM&P of enterprise networks
- has been the development of network management standards
- within various networking communities - most notably the
- ISO/CCITT and Internet communities. However, coordination of
- standards activities between these two communities has not
- occurred. As a result, although they share a nearly common
- management model, differences in their management protocols
- and structures of management information (SMIs) have
- developed due to differing management philosophies.
-
- The ISO/CCITT community has developed the Common Management
- Information Protocol (CMIP) [ISO9596-1], and related SMI
- documents [ISO10165-1,2,4]. The Internet community has
- developed the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)
- [RFC1157], and its successor, SNMPv2 [SNMPv2PROT]. The
- Internet SMI is defined in [RFC1155] and [SNMPv2SMI].
- Although functionally similar, the Internet and ISO/CCITT
- protocols and SMIs differ in terms of their complexity and
- specific operations.
-
- The focus on the need for end-to-end enterprise management
- has indicated the need to integrate the management of
- components accessed by ISO/CCITT management, Internet
- management and proprietary management mechanisms in a manner
- which presents a unified view of the network, despite
- protocol and SMI differences. One way to integrate
- management is by the development of "proxy" mechanisms which
- translate between functionally equivalent services, protocol
- and SMI differences to create this unified view.
-
- A body of telecommunications and computer vendors,
- represented by organizations such as the Network Management
- Forum (NMF), and the U.S. government, as specified in the
- Government Network Management Profile (GNMP) have based
- their integrated management model on the ISO/CCITT
- management model using CMIP and the ISO/CCITT SMI. These
- organizations are particularly interested in the development
- of proxies for devices that use the Internet management
- protocols and SMI. Their interest is primarily due to the
- widespread commercial implementation and use of such devices
- within their enterprises, especially devices that use the
- Internet TCP/IP protocol suite.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 2
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- The basic model for ISO/CCITT-Internet proxy management is
- illustrated in the following diagram.
-
-
- Manager Proxy
- Agent
- +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ +------
- ----------------+
- |+---------------------+| |+------+ +----------+| |+-----
- --------------+ |
- || Management || || GDMO | | Internet || ||
- Managed | |
- || Applications || || MIB | | MIB || ||
- Resources | |
- |+---------------------+| |+------+ +----------+| |+-----
- --------------+ |
- | | | |+-------------------+| |
- | |
- | | | || Service || |
- | |
- | | | || Emulation || |
- | |
- | | | ||(scoping) || |
- | |
- | | | || (filtering) || |
- | |
- | | | || (operations)|| |
- | |
- |+-----------+---------+| |+-------------------+| |+-----
- -----+---------+|
- || ISO/CCITT | GDMO || || Protocols Mapping || ||
- Internet | Internet||
- || Manager | MIB || || CMIS |...| SNMP || ||
- Agent | MIB ||
- |+-----------+---------+| |+-------------------+| |+-----
- -----+---------+|
- | | | | |CMIS | | | |
- |
- | | CMIS Services | | |Services | | | |
- SNMP "Services" |
- | | | | | | | | |
- |
- | | | | | SNMP| | | |
- |
- | | | | | "Services"| | | |
- |
- +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ +------
- ----------------+
- | CMIP | | CMIP | SNMP | |
- SNMP |
- +-----------------------+ +---------------------+ +------
- ----------------+
- ^ ^ ^
- ^
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 3
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- | | |
- |
- +---------------------+ +---------------
- ----+
- CMIP Messages SNMP
- Messages
-
-
- The proxy architecture provides emulation of CMIS services
- by mapping to the corresponding SNMP message(s) necessary to
- carry out the service request. The service emulation allows
- management of Internet objects by an ISO/CCITT manager. The
- left hand side of the proxy behaves like an ISO/CCITT agent,
- communicating with the ISO/CCITT manager using CMIP
- protocols. The right hand side of the proxy behaves like
- an Internet manager, communicating with the Internet agent
- using SNMP protocols.
-
- The proxy relies on the existence of a pair of directly-
- related MIB definitions, where the Internet MIB has been
- translated into ISO/CCITT GDMO using the procedures
- specified in [IIMCIMIBTRANS]. The proxy defined in
- [IIMCPROXY] uses these MIB definitions and rules to provide
- run-time translation of management information carried in
- service requests and responses.
-
- The proxy architecture is designed with a specified
- interface between the proxy and the underlying protocol
- stacks, and so deals primarily in terms of CMIS services and
- SNMP "services". The proxy emulates services such as CMIS
- scoping and filtering, processing of CMIS operations, and
- forwarding/logging of CMIS notifications by performing a
- mapping process which must be tailored for each protocol
- (for example, SNMP and SNMPv2 are variants of the same
- protocol mapping process).
-
- In addition, this document specifies translation procedures
- for converting ISO/CCITT GDMO MIBs into Internet MIBs. MIBs
- generated by this translation process cannot be utilized by
- the Proxy defined in [IIMCPROXY], although another kind of
- Proxy could be defined for this purpose in the future.
-
- Finally, note that MIBs translated by procedures such as
- those defined by [IIMCIMIBTRANS] and [IIMCOMIBTRANS] may
- also be used without a proxy. For example, a translated MIB
- may be used to take advantage of existing MIB definitions
- when business needs require deployment in a different
- management environment. Translated MIBs may also be used to
- provide uniformity when multiple management environments are
- supported by a single system (e.g., dual stack managers).
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 4
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 1.3 Scope
-
- In recent years computer networks have experienced an
- explosion in the number and complexity of objects to be
- managed. Especially challenging have been environments
- where platforms from many vendors must interact and complex
- software and hardware configurations must be supported. A
- chronic concern for such environments is end-to-end problem
- determination and resolution.
-
- Consequently there has been much effort toward standardizing
- the management of applications, networks, services and
- systems. Despite this major investment, consumers and
- standards participants have often found progress
- disturbingly slow --- especially in standardizing management
- information.
-
- To further complicate matters, different subcultures have
- developed differing philosophies and technologies for
- network management. Notable examples are the Internet and
- ISO/CCITT communities. Although MIB work in these
- communities has so far mostly been complementary there is
- increasing danger of duplicative, inconsistent and
- competitive MIB specification.
-
- Standardization is a political process and each philosophy
- of network management has its merits. However a network
- manger rarely has the luxury of being politician or
- philosopher; they must pragmatically determine problems in
- the network and rapidly resolve them. Typically, service
- must be assured in an end-to-end environment management by a
- wide range of technologies --- Internet, ISO/CCITT, and
- otherwise.
-
- If network management is to meet needs of such network
- operators, an "ecumenical" approach to MIBs is required that
- marries the work of these standards for a thus providing a
- comprehensive and consistent view of networked resources.
- An end-to-end approach is needed, one that conceals
- differences of protocol and presents the consolidated view
- of distributed resources to network operators, system
- administrators and programmers.
-
- This implies a common MIB independent of protocol. One way
- to arrive at this is to pursue comprehensive and
- mechanizable procedures to assist in translating MIB
- specifications. This should allow rapid sharing of MIB
- specifications while requiring minimal technical and
- political intervention by human beings.
-
- What you are reading is a contribution toward this end, a
- heuristic procedure to translate from ISO/CCITT GDMO MIB
- specifications to the Internet MIB macro specifications.
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 5
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- This translation procedure is written with four objectives
- in mind:
-
- - Lose as little functionality as possible in translation.
- - Minimize need for human involvement to translate.
- - Minimize cost to implement dual protocol and proxy-based
- applications.
- - Support generic network models that span many computer
- platforms and network elements.
-
- While an entirely mechanized translation from an ISO/CCITT
- GDMO MIB to an Internet MIB is not always possible, the
- intent is to mechanize the process as much as possible and
- supply reasonable defaults that then may be tempered with
- human judgment.
-
- In the longer term, MIBs translated in this manner might be
- used in conjunction with a proxy architecture that enables
- interworking between ISO/CCITT managers and Internet agents,
- or vice versa.
-
- Following is a procedure for translating management
- information bases (MIB's) from ISO/CCITT Guidelines for
- Definition of Managed Objects (GDMO) format to that of the
- Internet MIB macro format [RFC1212]. The body of this
- document has five parts:
-
- - This introduction, including motivation and objectives for
- the translation.
- - The translation procedure itself.
- - Constraints on use of the SNMP with MIBs translated by
- this procedure.
- - Summary.
-
- Sample inputs and translated outputs are also provided in an
- appendix. Examples used throughout the body of the text are
- taken from these samples.
-
- The following outstanding issues have been identified for
- inclusion in future versions of this document.
-
- - This procedure is based on current Internet SMI standards,
- but should be extended to also cover proposed SNMPv2 SMI
- standards. This is a definite requirement for Issue 1 of
- this algorithm.
-
- - Certain input "pragmas" may be appropriate to document
- human overrides to algorithmic translation in a systematic
- and machine readable form. Among other things, this might
- facilitate generation of proxies. Pragmas, however, are
- beyond the scope of Issue 1.
-
- This paper assumes the existence of appropriate mechanisms
- and procedures for registry of translated objects. What
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 6
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- those procedures might be and where such objects should be
- registered, however, is beyond the scope of this document.
-
-
- 1.4 Terms and Conventions
-
- The reader is assumed to be familiar with the vocabularies
- of Internet and ISO/CCITT management; in cases where there
- might be confusion between the two, words such as
- "ISO/CCITT", "GDMO" and "Internet" are inserted to avoid
- ambiguity.
-
- The following conventions are used throughout the paper:
-
- The terms "class" and "attribute" when expressed in lower
- case are generic, referring either to ISO/CCITT MANAGED
- OBJECT CLASS's and ATTRIBUTE's (respectively) or their
- translated Internet MIB counterparts.
-
- The term "arc" means a single level of branching within an
- Abstract Syntax Notation One(ASN.1) registration tree.
-
- The terms "enumerate" and "explode" are used synonymously to
- describe the process of translating ATTRIBUTE's and their
- values to OBJECT TYPE macros.
-
- A "registry family" is defined to be a set of ASN.1 OBJECT
- IDENTIFIER arcs and node shaving a common immediate parent.
-
- Footnotes explore aspects of the translation procedure where
- human judgment may be especially advisable, rather than
- accepting the raw output of a translator.
-
-
- 2. Translation Procedures
-
-
- 2.1 Relationship to RFC1212
-
- While translation per se has not been widely investigated,
- [RFC1212] does provide advice for adopting MIB objects from
- ISO/CCITT GDMO to Internet MIB macros. However, RFC 1212
- advises a minimalistic approach to MIB specification,
- discouraging carryover of the complexities often found in
- ISO/CCITT GDMO specifications. Thus, it does not so much
- tell how to translate a MIB as provide advice for borrowing
- elements of a ISO/CCITT GDMO specification and constructing
- a MIB more in keeping with Internet philosophy.
-
- The translation procedure provided here seeks instead to
- provide as faithful a translation as possible, in order to
- support the objectives identified in section 1.2 above.
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 7
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- As applicable, the subsections are divided into one or more
- of the following parts:
-
- - Relevant advice quoted verbatim from RFC1212. Beware that
- the entire RFC is not quoted here. The reader is referred
- to the source for complete text.
- - Additional constraints are identified to allow as
- comprehensive and mechanizable an approach as possible.
- - Discussion of the translation procedure is provided as
- guidance to the reader.
-
-
- 2.2 Mapping of Managed Object Classes and Attributes
-
-
- 2.2.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- ... The next step is to categorize the objects into groups.
- For experimental MIB's, optional objects are permitted.
- However, when a MIB module is placed in the Internet-
- standard space, these optional objects are either removed,
- or placed in an optional group, which, if implemented, all
- objects in the group must be implemented. For the first
- pass, it is wisest to simply ignore any optional objects in
- the original MIB: experience shows it is better to define a
- core MIB module first, containing only essential objects;
- later, if experience demands, other objects can be added.
-
- It must be emphasized that groups are "units of conformance"
- within a MIB: everything in a group is "mandatory" and
- implementations do either whole groups or none.
-
- Next for each managed object class, determine whether there
- can exist multiple instances of that managed object class.
- If not, then for each of its attributes, use the OBJECT TYPE
- macro to make an equivalent definition.
-
- Otherwise, if multiple instances of the managed object class
- can exist, then define a conceptual table having conceptual
- rows each containing a columnar object for each of the
- managed object class's attributes. If the managed object
- class is contained within the containment tree of another
- managed object class, then the assignment of an object type
- is normally required for each of the "distinguished
- attributes" of the containing managed object class. If they
- do not already exist within the MIB module, then they can be
- added via the definition of additional columnar objects in
- the conceptual row corresponding to the contained managed
- object class.
-
- In defining a conceptual row, it is useful to consider the
- optimization of network management operations which will act
- upon its columnar objects. In particular, it is wisest to
- avoid defining more columnar objects within a conceptual
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 8
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- row, than can fit in a single PDU. As a rule of thumb, a
- conceptual row should contain no more than approximately 20
- objects. Similarly, or as a way to abide by the "20 object
- guideline", columnar objects should be grouped into tables
- according to the expected grouping of network management
- operations upon them. As such, the content of conceptual
- rows should reflect typical access scenarios, e.g., they
- should be organized along functional lines such as one row
- for statistics and another row for parameters, or along
- usage lines such as commonly-needed objects versus rarely-
- needed objects.
-
- On the other hand, the definition of conceptual rows where
- the number of columnar objects used as indexes outnumbers
- the number used to hold information, should also be avoided.
- In particular, the splitting of a managed object class's
- attributes into many conceptual tables should not be used as
- a way to obtain the same degree of flexibility/complexity as
- is often found in MIB's with a myriad of optionality.
-
-
- 2.2.2 Additional Constraints
-
- This subsection addresses:
-
- - Mapping of MANAGED OBJECT CLASSES and Distinguished Names.
- - Mapping of PACKAGE's.
-
- It deals only with the high level procedures for mapping
- ISO/CCITT GDMO MANAGED OBJECT CLASSES and ATTRIBUTE's into
- Internet MIB macros. Enumeration of individual ATTRIBUTE
- values is addressed in subsection 2.3.
-
- 2.2.2.1 Mapping of MANAGED OBJECT CLASSES and Distinguished
- Names
-
- Translation of a registry family of MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
- specifications begins by
-
- - Allocating the root of a registry subtree to contain the
- translated objects.
- - Assigning a brief naming prefix that distinguishes
- contents of a corresponding ASN.1 module generated by the
- translation. The module itself is registered at the root
- of the registry subtree.
-
- Note: Assignment of naming prefixes and registry
- subtrees are required activities, however,
- procedures for these are outside the scope of this
- paper
-
- For each MANAGED OBJECT CLASS of the input registry family,
- define a corresponding Internet MIB object group, its "class
- group" Reserve an arc for each of these, keeping the same
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 9
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- relative arc number as is assigned to its equivalent MANAGED
- OBJECT CLASS in the input ISO/CCITT GDMO registry. Avoid
- registration of ISO/CCITT objects under arc zero(0) by using
- the value 16,384 instead.
-
- For each class group define one Internet MIB table --- a
- "class table" --- that represents the class as a whole.
- Assign this table arc number 1 beneath the arc of the class
- group. As will be further discussed in subsection 2.3
- below, "side tables" will also often be required for a class
- group to support multi-valued ATTRIBUTE's and ATTRIBUTE's
- with complex syntaxes. Assign arcs for side tables in
- ascending order beneath the arc of the class group beginning
- with arc number two.
-
- Note: Since all ATTRIBUTE's expand into class tables or
- side tables, class groups generated by the algorithm
- never contain scalar values.
-
- For each table in the class group, define a table entry
- object and syntax consistent with RFC 1212 usage for table
- entries.
-
- For the entries of each class table, begin by allocating the
- following conceptual columns and associated arcs:
-
- - Leg 0 beneath the class entry arc is reserved (by the
- Internet Structure of Management Information (SMI)).
-
- - Assign leg 1 the delete object, a write-only INTEGER for
- which 0 indicates deletion of the corresponding conceptual
- row.
-
- - Leg 2 of the arc is assigned the "class entry index," an
- INTEGER valued object that provides the unique index for
- an entry to the class table. This distinguishes an
- instance of an object within its class.
- The value of the class entry index is a component of the
- "class entry instance." The latter identifies both an
- object's class and the unique instance within that class.
- This value is used in the translated MIB instead of
- Distinguished Name's and ObjectInstance's that represent
- relationships between managed objects. As discussed
- later, no direct translation of Distinguished Names is
- attempted. The class entry instance is arrived at by
- concatenating:
- -- The OBJECT IDENTIFIER of the class table entry.
- -- The value 2 (arc number for the class entry index)
- -- The value of the class entry index for the instance in
- question.
-
- Note: Where "concatenating" means arriving at a
- simple combined sequence of arc values, without
- repeat counts or nesting.
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 10
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
-
- Entries of side tables begin in similar fashion:
-
- - Leg 0 is reserved.
-
- - Leg 1 is assigned the delete object.
-
- - Leg 2 of the arc is assigned the class entry index, which
- has the same value as the corresponding class entry index
- of the class table. This ties side table entries to their
- corresponding class table entry.
-
- - Leg 3 of the arc is assigned the first (and typically
- only) "value index"; this distinguishes a particular value
- of a multi-valued attribute or syntax from the other
- values.
-
- - Legs 4-19 of the arc can be assigned if necessary to
- provide additional entry value indices. These are needed
- only for nested multiply occurring syntaxes.
-
- Note: The mapping of multiply occurring elements of
- syntaxes is discussed further in later sections. While
- supported for completeness, multi-dimensional values
- represent an extreme case. Caution should be used in
- adopting the raw output of the algorithm for complex
- syntaxes.
-
-
- 2.2.2.2 Mapping of PACKAGE's
-
- In reading this section the reader may wish to refer to
- Figures 1 and 2, which illustrate the input and output
- subtrees of the sample MIB (Appendix A). Note that for this
- example, the Trouble Administration module is rooted beneath
- an (optional) version arc, to facilitate future releases.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 11
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- |
- | Trouble Report Registry
- +-------------------+----------------------+
- | |
- trMObjectClass trAttribute
- | |
- | +-----+-----+-----+
- troubleReport(5) | | | |
- accessTime .... cancel
- LocationList(2) RequestedBy
- Manager(12)
-
- Figure 1. Sample Input Registration Tree
-
- All else being equal, enumerate ATTRIBUTE's based upon a
- left-to-right scanning of the input ISO/CCITT GDMO
- specification. ATTRIBUTE's and their values may be
- enumerated multiple times in the course of translating a
- specification, once for every template in which they are
- referenced. For example, if an attribute is included in the
- PACKAGE's of two MANAGED OBJECT CLASS's, it will be
- enumerated twice in the output: once for each class group.
-
- Enumerate ATTRIBUTE's and their values in the same sequence
- as declared in a PACKAGE. These translate to OBJECT TYPE's
- that, unless otherwise noted below, receive successive arcs
- in the output registry tree.
-
- Enumerate all components of base classes before those of
- their derivative classes. Thus where a package is refined
- by a subclass, first enumerate all components of the base
- class, keeping the sequence of the base class PACKAGE's.
- Explode ATTRIBUTE's of a derivative class later, enumerating
- in the order of specification for that class.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 12
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
-
-
- |
- +Network Version
- |Management
- |V1 (1)
- .............................|..............................
- +Trouble ASN.1
- |Administration Module
- |(4)
- .............................|..............................
- +trTrouble Class
- |Report(5) Group
- +-------------------------------+
- | |
- ...............|...............................|............
- Class Tables +trTrouble +trTrouble
- and Side |ReportTable (1) |ReportAccess
- Tables | |TimeLocation
- | |ListTable(2)
- ...............|...............................|............
- Class and +trTrouble +trTrouble
- Side Table |ReportTableEntry (1) |ReportAccess
- Entries | |TimeLocation
- | |ListTable
- | |Entry(1)
- ...............|...............................|............
- Enumerated +--trTATroubleReportDelete (1) +--(etc)
- Attribute |
- Values +--trTATroubleReportIndex (2)
- |
- +--trTATroubleReportCancel
- RequestedByManager (20)
-
- Figure 2. Sample Output Registration Tree
-
- Reserve at least ten arcs for future growth for each level
- of derivation, i.e., take the highest arc number of the base
- class, add ten and round upwards to the nearest even
- multiple of ten, to determine the first arc number assigned
- to the derivative class.
-
- For multiple inheritance, enumerate contents of base classes
- left-to-right and depth first, i.e., enumerate all
- components attributable to one immediate base class before
- proceeding to the next. In this case also reserve arcs for
- future growth by adding ten and rounding up to the nearest
- even multiple of ten.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 13
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.2.3 Discussion
-
-
- 2.2.3.1 Mapping of MANAGED OBJECT CLASSES and
- Distinguished Names
-
- RFC 1212 recommends defining a table for every object group
- that can be multiply occurring within an agent. It would be
- very unusual for a MANAGED OBJECT CLASS not to have
- potentially multiple occurrences, especially given a generic
- network model that spans systems. Thus to simplify
- translation, all object classes map to tables. This
- approach has several advantages:
-
- - It supports default values for new object instances.
-
- - It is easy to mechanize, since there is no need to
- recognize special cases that are not multiply occurring.
-
- - It simplifies programming of proxy or dual protocol
- agents, since the programmer is dealing with basically the
- same syntax for scalar items, regardless of protocol.
-
- The last point applies to both programming effort and
- processing overhead. To the extent the elements of syntax
- are mapped one-to-one, and underlying syntax is similar or
- identical for both protocols, they can be manipulated with
- common code and common data structures. This simplifies
- translation from both the programming and run-time
- perspectives.
-
- The notion of a class entry instance is introduced since
- direct translation of Distinguished Name's appears
- impractical for the following reasons:
-
- - A possible ambiguity arises since NAME BINDING's allow
- different object instances of the same MANAGED OBJECT
- CLASS to exist under parent objects of different classes.
- Likewise, different classes can have the same syntax for
- their distinguished attribute(s). Thus, a concatenation
- of attribute values is not sufficient to uniquely
- distinguish an object instance.
-
- - NAME BINDING's allow different instances of the same class
- to be subordinate to different types of parent and even
- allow instances of a class to be contained recursively
- within others of the same class. Thus, in directly
- translating the DN one cannot assume a fixed sequence of
- parameters as required for by the INDEX clause (DN's for
- different instances of the same object class may be have
- different numbers of RDN's).
-
- - Both problems could in theory be circumvented by fully
- translating the Distinguished Name and incorporating
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 14
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- Attribute Type's as well as Attribute Value's into the
- subidentifier OID (in which case the INDEX clause would
- only need to specify one index, an OBJECT IDENTIFIER).
-
- While the latter is in theory possible, it would result in
- exceedingly verbose subidentifiers, on the order of 70
- octets rather than 7. This is of serious concern due to PDU
- length restrictions for SNMP. RFC 1212 proposes a "rule of
- twenty," i.e., no more than twenty attributes per operation.
- That guideline was designed for relatively compact
- subidentifiers. When using an RDN for an INDEX, this would
- more likely amount to a "rule of three," which is why
- comprehensive translation of the ISO/CCITT DN to an INDEX
- appears practical.
-
- The result of this approach is that Distinguished Names are
- NOT translated at all. Similar functionality (naming of
- objects) is instead provided by OBJECT IDENTIFIERS that
- identify the table entries which corresponding to MANAGED
- OBJECTs. The indexes of these tables are arbitrary integers
- that have no significance other than discriminate between
- the entries of a table. In general, all management
- information that is mapped by this specification to OBJECT-
- TYPEs is mapped to tables that have one or more arbitrary
- indexes of type INTEGER. Class table entries in particular
- have exactly one index.
-
- For the following reasons, attributes of TOP are not
- directly translated into OBJECT TYPE's:
-
- - Most of these notions will be unfamiliar to the Internet
- user and thus their presence would add questionable value.
-
- - Multi-valued attributes would require additional side
- tables for all object class groups, which would be
- cumbersome.
-
- - Managed object class is implicit in the class prefix thus
- does not require a special attribute.
-
- - An allomorphs attribute is supported in ISO/CCITT to allow
- dynamic recognition of allomorphs which are supported by
- an instance. Since Internet MIB does not support
- allomorphs at all --- much less dynamic ones --- there is no
- reason to list them.
-
- - There is no notion of NAME BINDING's for Internet MIB.
- NAME BINDING rules must still be enforced for the
- translated MIB, and should be documented via comments in
- the Internet MIB specifications. However, there seems to
- be no point in providing this attribute to the Internet
- user in the run time environment.
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 15
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- - Presence or absence of conditional packages can be
- detected using a GetNextRequest and determining whether
- the conceptual rows returned are the same as expected. No
- special attribute is needed for this purpose.
-
- The ocNameBindingTable of the ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB
- provides a mechanism by which name bindings can be
- inspected, also provided upon object creation. This feature
- is included for completeness and to avoid ambiguity. It is
- unlikely to be used often, so it is placed in a table rather
- than enumerated in the class tables.
-
-
- 2.2.3.2 Mapping of PACKAGE's
-
- Left-to-right sequential enumeration is the obvious approach
- for a mechanized translation procedure.
-
- While ISO/CCITT GDMO allows ATTRIBUTE's and ASN.1 syntaxes
- to be referenced in multiple places and thus be shared,
- Internet MIB format does not. Thus one or more OBJECT
- TYPE's must be specified for each template in which they are
- referenced. The consequent explosion of enumerated
- ATTRIBUTE's and ASN.1 syntaxes is a major motivation for a
- mechanizable procedure and mechanized translation aids.
-
-
- 2.3 Mapping to the SYNTAX clause
-
-
- 2.3.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- When mapping to the SYNTAX clause of the OBJECT TYPE macro:
-
- (1) An object with BOOLEAN syntax becomes an INTEGER taking
- either of values true(1) or false(2).
-
- (2) An object with ENUMERATED syntax becomes an INTEGER,
- taking any of the values given.
-
- (3) An object with BIT STRING syntax containing no more
- than 32 bits becomes an INTEGER defined as a sum; otherwise
- if more than 32 bits are present, the object becomes an
- OCTETSTRING, with the bits numbered from left-to-right, in
- which the least significant bits of the last octet may be
- "reserved for future use."
-
- (4) An object with a character string syntax becomes either
- an OCTETSTRING or a DisplayString, depending on the
- repertoire of the character string.
-
- (5) An non-tabular object with a complex syntax, such as
- REAL or EXTERNAL, must be decomposed, usually into an OCTET
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 16
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- STRING (if sensible). As a rule, any object with a
- complicated syntax should be avoided.
-
- (6) Tabular objects must be decomposed into rows of
- columnar objects.
-
-
- 2.3.2 Additional Constraints
-
-
- 2.3.2.1 Simple Input Syntax
-
- Following are rules for translating non-constructed
- (scalar)syntax.
-
- For ENUMERATED types, transform to INTEGER, with values of
- (0) mapped to (32767).
-
- Where ISO/CCITT management allows certain forms to be
- present or not present on a case by case basis (i.e.,
- conditional packages and ASN.1 OPTIONAL and CHOICE
- syntaxes)enumerate all possibilities and allow corresponding
- conceptual columns to be conditionally present on a row-by-
- row basis.
-
- For CHOICE types, provide an OBJECT TYPE for every
- alternative and populate exactly one of these alternatives
- per conceptual row.
-
- For ASN.1 string types, use DisplayString whenever the
- character set actually expected in the element is a subset
- of DisplayString, else specify OCTET STRING.
-
- In general, treat a constructed type that contains no more
- than one scalar (e.g., various forms of string
- specialization) as if it were the contained scalar.
-
- ANY's and ANY DEFINED BY's map to OCTET STRING's that
- contain the BER encoded values of the corresponding ASN.1
- types.
-
-
- 2.3.2.2.Complex Input Syntax
-
- Map compound constructors (those that may contain multiple
- scalars) to SEQUENCES --- including SET syntaxes.
-
- Expansion of compound constructors sometimes requires
- definition of "side tables," ancillary tables within the
- object group that supplement the main table representing the
- ISO/CCITT GDMO managed object class. The rules for making
- side tables are applied recursively and are as follows:
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 17
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- - For a given level of nesting, if the ISO/CCITT GDMO ASN.1
- syntax is SEQUENCE (not SEQUENCE OF) or SET (not SET OF)
- enumerate its scalar elements "in-line" without
- constructing a new side table, and otherwise treat them as
- if scalars.
-
- - Otherwise (SEQUENCE OF or SET OF) enumerate the scalar
- elements of the SEQUENCE or SET in a new side table that
- is a "child" of the current table. Since this may happen
- recursively, a side table may be a child of another side
- table.
-
- - The INDEX of a child table is that of its parent
- concatenated with a value index that uniquely
- distinguishes instances within the child table.
-
-
- 2.3.3 Discussion
-
-
- 2.3.3.1 Simple Input Syntax
-
- Internet SMI precludes a value of zero and some compilers
- won't take it. 32767 is a number that practically any
- machine architecture can support and is large enough so it
- should not conflict with any enumerated actually specified.
-
- Allowing optional conceptual columns within rows is not
- consistent with the philosophy of RFC 1212, but neither are
- the MIB's the procedure seeks to translate. However,
- optional columns can be accommodated by SNMP using the
- GetNext request. In that case protocol returns inconsistent
- object ID prefixes for any non-present objects, rather than
- an error condition.
-
-
- 2.3.3.2 Complex Input Syntax
-
- This is the messiest part of the translation process but
- cannot be avoided given that the ISO/CCITT GDMO information
- model is to be carried over. One way of looking at this is
- that constructed types are put in "third normal form," i.e.,
- broken up into a set of flat tables each of which has a
- unique key. In EVERY case that key is comprised of one or
- more ARBITRARY indexes of type INTEGER. The class table
- entries have exactly one such index. Multi-valued
- attributes are represented as side tables that typically
- have two indexes: the first BEING the index of the
- corresponding class table entry and the second an arbitrary
- integer that distinguishes one attribute value from another
- for the multi-valued case. If a set valued ATTRIBUTE
- contained a multiply occurring syntax (e.g., SEQUENCE OF)
- that would map to a side table with three indexes of type
- INTEGER: first, the index of the class table entry, second,
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 18
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- the index of the attribute value, and third, the index of
- the multiply occurrence of the syntax.
-
- There is no need for explicit pointers from class table
- entries to side tables or vice versa. Given the index of a
- side table entry, one can find the corresponding class table
- entry since the class arc is known and the subidentifier is
- also known, i.e., the first index of the side table.
- Likewise, knowing the arc for a side table and the index of
- a corresponding class entry, one can use the side table arc
- suffixed by the index in a GetNextRequest to discover the
- first entry in the side table.
-
- There is a convention in the Internet world that the key of
- a table references only attributes contained within that
- table. The translation procedure honors that practice by
- defining distinct OBJECT TYPE's for all indices of side
- tables, although though a child table only has only one
- index with a different value from its parent's.
-
- There may very well be a "natural key" for multi-valued
- syntax, e.g., an address or name. In this case, an
- artificial index may be inappropriate. Human judgment must
- weigh whether there is a "natural" key and whether the
- length of the associated subidentifier would be permissible
- for purposes of indexing.
-
- Note: It is not recommended that natural keys be used
- for the INDEX parameter of a class table as that will
- result in very long subidentifiers and complicate
- allocation of indexes for new object creation. Human
- judgment can be used to supplement class entry indices
- with side tables that provide secondary indices that
- support access based on natural keys.
-
- There is no need to actually access OBJECT TYPES that
- correspond to table indices --- you would have to know them
- first to read them, and they can't be changed. Therefore,
- their ACCESS clauses specify not-accessible.
-
-
- 2.4 Generation of Internet MIB Identifiers
-
-
- 2.4.1 Translation Procedure
-
- This discussion has two parts:
-
- - Definition of notation for mapping rules.
-
- - Rules for name mapping, with examples.
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 19
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.4.1.1 Notation
-
- <ASN.1 id> Identifier of a production rule
- specified using Abstract Syntax
- Notation One (ASN.1), e.g.,
- "AccessTimeLocationList."
-
- <ATTRIBUTE id> Identifier used for ATTRIBUTE
- template, e.g.,"Trouble
- ReportCancelRequestedByManager."
- <MANAGEDOBJECT Identifier used for MANAGED OBJECT
- CLASS template, e.g.,"TroubleReport."
- CLASS id>
-
- <module prefix> An arbitrary literal assigned to the
- ASN.1 module to be generated, e.g.,
- "t1TA."
-
- <n> A decimal string literal indicating
- the dimension represented by a value
- index of a side table. The first
- dimension corresponds to the instance
- of the managed object (i.e., class
- index) and <n> is not concatenated in
- its name. <n> is null valued for the
- second dimension, which is usually
- the greatest dimension, i.e., the
- standard multi-valued attribute.
- Values of <n> for higher dimensions
- are decimal literals assigned in
- ascending sequence starting with "3,"
- i.e., "3," "4," etc. Note: This
- option is included for completeness.
- This is a good example of a case
- where human judgment should be used
- before carrying over full
- functionality between MIB's.
-
- Figure 3. Variables for Generating Identifiers
-
- The following notation is used to specify mapping rules:
-
- - Symbols enclosed in quotes are literals.
-
- - Symbols enclosed in angle brackets ("<>") are variables
- that have different string values depending on instance or
- context. Figure 3 describes the variables.
-
- - Double upended bars ("||") signify the concatenation
- operator. For this operator, literals are concatenated
- without modification. When concatenating a variable
- however, its first character of its value string is
- promoted to upper case. Strings are concatenated without
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 20
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- intervening punctuation or white space to arrive at the
- resulting identifier.
-
-
- 2.4.1.2. Mapping Rules
-
- The following table provides mapping rules for generating
- Internet MIB identifiers. An example is provided for each
- rule, based on the sample inputs and outputs of Appendix A.
-
- Identifier Syntax and Example
-
- class table <module prefix>||<MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
- id>||"Table"
- e.g., t1TATroubleReportTable
- class <module prefix>||<MANAGED OBJECT
- (table)entry CLASSid>||"TableEntry"
- e.g., t1TATroubleReportTableEntry
- class entry <module prefix> || <MANAGED OBJECT CLASSid>
- delete flag || "Delete"
- e.g., t1TATroubleReportDelete
- class entry <module prefix> || <MANAGED OBJECTCLASS id>
- index of class || "Index"
- table e.g., t1TATroubleReportIndex
-
- conceptual row <module prefix> ||<MANAGED OBJECT id> CLASS
- of class table || <ATTRIBUTE id> || <ASN.1 id>
- e.g., t1TATroubleReport
- side table <module prefix> || <MANAGED OBJECT CLASS id>
- || <ATTRIBUTE id>|| <ASN.1 id>* ||
- "Table"
- e.g.,t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList
- Table
- side (table) <module prefix> ||<MANAGED OBJECT CLASS id>
- entry ||<ATTRIBUTE id> || "TableEntry"
- e.g.,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList
- TableEntry
- side entry <module prefix>|| <MANAGED OBJECT CLASS id>
- delete flag || "Delete"
- e.g.,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList
- Delete
- class entry <moduleprefix> || <MANAGED OBJECT CLASS id>
- index of side || <ATTRIBUTE id> || "ClassIndex"
- table e.g.,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList
- ClassIndex
- value index of <module prefix> || <MANAGED OBJECT CLASS id>
- side table || <ATTRIBUTE id> || "ValueIndex" ||
- <n>
- e.g.,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList
- ValueIndex
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 21
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- Figure 4. Mapping Rules for Generating Identifiers
-
- * Note: The <ASN.1 id> is only present in the names of
- side table objects when its presence is necessary to
- unambiguously distinguish the table in question.
-
- The identifier for the syntax for a (class or side) table
- entry is the same as that of the table entry itself except
- the first character is promoted to upper case, e.g.,
- "T1TATroubleReportTableEntry."
-
-
- 2.4.2 Discussion
-
- This approach is verbose but can be mechanized and
- ambiguities and collisions should be rare. It has the
- further advantage that names can be used for C language
- program variables without further manipulation.
-
- Separating constituent ids with hyphens would increase
- readability and decrease likelihood of ambiguity.
- Unfortunately, many Internet MIB compilers do not allow
- this.
-
- In cases where the same ATTRIBUTE appears in more than one
- PACKAGE included in a MANAGED OBJECT CLASS, manual
- intervention is necessary to assign distinct identifiers for
- the corresponding OBJECT TYPE's.
-
-
- 2.5 Mapping to the ACCESS clause
-
-
- 2.5.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- This is straight-forward.
-
-
- 2.5.2 Discussion
-
- Note that ADD-REMOVE and REPLACE map to "write," while GET
- maps to "read." There is no direct mapping to SET-TO-
- DEFAULT, since SNMP requires values be explicitly set for
- existing objects. PERMITTED VALUES are not directly mapped
- in the Internet MIB but need to be understood by the
- management station.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 22
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.6 Mapping to the STATUS clause
-
-
- 2.6.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- This is usually straight-forward; however, some osified-MIBs
- use the term "recommended." In this case, a choice must be
- made between "mandatory" and "optional."
-
-
- 2.6.2 Additional Constraints
-
- The translation procedure always uses mandatory.
-
-
- 2.6.3 Discussion
-
- Human judgment can qualify this as necessary.
-
-
- 2.7 Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause
-
-
- 2.7.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- This is straight-forward: simply copy the text, making sure
- that any embedded double quotation marks are sanitized
- (i.e., replaced with single-quotes or removed).
-
-
- 2.8 Mapping to the REFERENCE clause
-
-
- 2.8.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- This is straight-forward: simply include a textual reference
- to the object being mapped, the document which defines the
- object, and perhaps a page number in the document.
-
-
- 2.8.2 Additional Constraints
-
- The translation procedure transcribes the registry of the
- ATTRIBUTE to the corresponding OBJECT-TYPE REFERENCE clause,
- which ensures that proper ASN.1 syntax for the values of
- OBJECT IDENTIFIERs is retained. If any additional
- information is to be provided in this value, it must be
- provided to the left of the machine readable ASN.1 syntax
- and separated from it by a colon, e.g., "ISO 10165-2: joint-
- iso-ccitt ms (9) smi(3) part2(2)attribute(7)". This
- facilitates generation of proxies.
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 23
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.9 Mapping to the INDEX clause
-
-
- 2.9.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- Decide how instance-identifiers for columnar objects are to
- be formed and define this clause accordingly.
-
-
- 2.9.2 Additional Constraints
-
- Use the class entry index's for the table and any containing
- table, as discussed previously. This keeps the index for
- any particular kind of table constant and predictable.
-
-
- 2.10 Mapping to the DEFVAL clause
-
-
- 2.10.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- Decide if a meaningful default value can be assigned to the
- object being mapped, and if so, define the DEFVAL clause
- accordingly.
-
-
- 2.10.2 Additional Constraints
-
- Please see the previous sections on mapping of managed
- objects and syntaxes.
-
-
- 2.11 Translation of Actions
-
-
- 2.11.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
-
- 2.11.1.1 General Advice
-
- Actions are modeled as read-write objects, in which writing
- a particular value results in the action taking place.
-
- Usually an INTEGER syntax is used with a distinguished value
- provided for each action that the object provides access to.
- In addition, there is usually one other distinguished value,
- which is the one returned when the object is read.
-
-
- 2.11.1.2 Mapping to the ACCESS clause
-
- Always use read-write.
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 24
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.11.1.3 Mapping to the STATUS clause
-
- This is straight-forward.
-
-
- 2.11.1.4 Mapping to the DESCRIPTION clause
-
- This is straight-forward: simply copy the text, making sure
- that any embedded double quotation marks are sanitized
- (i.e., replaced with single-quotes or removed).
-
-
- 2.11.1.5 Mapping to the REFERENCE clause
-
- This is straight-forward: simply include a textual reference
- to the action being mapped, the document which defines the
- action, and perhaps a page number in the document.
-
-
- 2.11.2 Discussion
-
- This is one of the areas where mechanization can at best be
- an aid, rather than an automatic solution, to translation.
- The RFC 1212 advice provides a point of departure in this
- regard.
-
-
- 2.12 Translation of Notifications
-
-
- 2.12.1 Approach
-
- This subsection provides a method whereby notifications are
- translated to traps. This method provides the basis for
- translation of standard Definition of Management Information
- (DMI) [ISO10165-2] NOTIFICATIONs to traps as reflected in
- the ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB of Appendix B. Since use of
- traps is strongly discouraged in the Internet community and
- there is no filtering mechanism in SNMP, such translation
- should be done very sparingly. In particular,
-
- - Mapping of notifications to traps should always have a
- documented justification.
-
- - Wherever such mapping is deemed necessary, the standard
- traps provided in Appendix B of this specification should be
- used, if applicable.
-
- Where translation of NOTIFICATIONs is necessary, the
- following method can be used:
-
- (1) For each input registry subtree in which there are
- NOTIFICATIONs or ATTRIBUTEs to be translated, establish a
- corresponding output registry subtree to hold the translated
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 25
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- MIB (in the example of Appendix B, the output subtrees are
- onSMI2toInternetNotification and onSMI2toInternetAttributeID
- respectively).
-
- A separate ASN.1 module is generated for each subtree in
- which NOTIFICATIONs to be translated are registered.
- Mappings of corresponding ATTRIBUTEs are also incorporated
- in each such output module, which may lead to objects
- (VARIABLES) of the same registry appearing in different
- ASN.1 modules. The registration of the resulting ASN.1
- module is the same as that of the root of the output
- registry subtree assigned for notifications. Mnemonic
- naming of the output module is encouraged but outside the
- scope of this specification.
-
- Assign a naming prefix for translated ATTRIBUTEs and
- NOTIFICATIONs. This must start with a lower case letter
- ("on" is the prefix for translated notifications in Appendix
- B).
-
- Editor's Note: [Should we consider auto registry of the MIB
- module]
-
- (2) For each notification to be mapped list its:
- identifier; arc within its input registry subtree; and
- mandatory ATTRIBUTEs. For mandatory ATTRIBUTEs, also list
- the corresponding syntaxes resolved to.
-
- (3) For each syntax identified in (2), determine a mapping
- to the Concise MIB domain. The mapping rules are the same as
- for subsection 2.3 (Mapping to the SYNTAX Clause) above, but
- with added constraints that resulting syntax must be scalar
- and of fixed type (not a CHOICE). Where the rules of
- subsection 2.3 do not yield such a form, the syntax of
- DisplayString is used (as a default). This is an area in
- which human judgment will often be required following
- deterministic translation.
-
- (4) Define an OBJECT-TYPE (variable) for each ATTRIBUTE
- identified in (2):
-
- - The identifier of the resulting object is arrived at by
- promoting the first character of the input identifier to
- upper case and prepending the prefix of (1). Thus for
- example eventTime becomes onEventTime given the prefix "on."
-
- - The value for the ACCESS clause is always not-
- accessible.
-
- - The value of the STATUS clause is always mandatory.
-
- - The value of the REFERENCE clause reflects the
- registration of the input ATTRIBUTE. The value for this
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 26
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- clause also follows the convention for machine readability
- described in subsection 2.7.
-
- - The value of the DESCRIPTION clause is taken from the
- BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS parameter, if any. This value is
- otherwise empty. This clause will often need to be
- supplemented by comments, and should be manually edited if
- the full semantics cannot be carried over due to syntactical
- or other restrictions.
-
- - The applicable syntax selected in step (3) is used for
- the value of the SYNTAX clause.
-
- - The (relative) leg number for the output registry is
- the same as for the input registry.
-
- (5) For each input notification, define a corresponding
- TRAP-TYPE:
-
- - The identifier of the resulting trap is the same as for
- the notification except that its first letter is promoted to
- upper case and the prefix provided in (1) is prepended. For
- example, "objectCreation" maps to "onObjectCreation" given
- the prefix "on".
-
- - The VARIABLES parameter reflects all mandatory
- ATTRIBUTEs as identified in(2) and translated in (4), plus
- two variables that are always present:
- onManagedObjectInstance and onAdditionalText.
-
- - The text of the description is the same as for the
- BEHAVIOUR DEFINED AS parameter of the corresponding
- NOTIFICATION, if any.
-
- - The REFERENCE clause reflects the registry of the input
- NOTIFICATION, using the conventions as for machine
- readability established in subsection 2.7 above.
-
- - The relative leg number for the output registry
- (ENTERPRISE clause) is the same as for the input registry.
-
-
- 2.12.2 Discussion
-
- Limitations of this procedure reflect basic functional
- differences between the CMIP and SNMP, with much necessarily
- lost in translation.
-
- In particular, SNMP Version 1 provides no mechanism for
- filtering traps at the source, and the Internet community
- frowns on the usage of traps in any case. Thus anyone
- translating a MIB according to this procedure should avoid
- translating NOTIFICATIONs without good reason. Where this
- cannot be avoided, only the minimum necessary functionality
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 27
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- should be carried over --- and the justification for this
- should be documented. Such decisions should be made on a
- class by class, NOTIFICATION by NOTIFICATION and even
- ATTRIBUTE by ATTRIBUTE basis. While translated DMI
- NOTIFICATIONs are provided here for the sake of
- completeness, it may never be appropriate to use some of
- these traps.
-
- The method described in the preceding subsection can be
- mechanized. However, at best this will provide the human
- translator with default options and a point of departure for
- making hard choices.
-
- The mapping of all ATTRIBUTE syntaxes to scalar types
- simplifies mapping of identifiers and facilitates auto
- registry. Notwithstanding, this approach can in certain
- cases be ugly and even unworkable. However, that seems to
- be the case for any deterministic procedure. Human judgment
- and intervention will often be required.
-
- Consider for example the following. One could deal with
- optional syntax by defining different variables for
- reporting all optional forms. At the same time one could
- define "null" values for each variable. Variables for all
- options could then be passed in a trap message, with exactly
- one of them non-empty.
-
- However, specification of null values is messy and does not
- lend itself to automation. This also complicates assignment
- of identifiers and arcs, since there is a one-to-many
- mapping. Furthermore, passing of empty parameters is
- inefficient and complicates the work of a manager, which
- must determine which variable is "real." In any case, this
- approach does not address multi-valued ATTRIBUTEs --- only
- CHOICEs.
-
- For the translated DMI NOTIFICATIONs of Appendix B, multi-
- valued ATTRIBUTEs are dealt with(as necessary) by issuing
- separate traps for each attribute value. This is perhaps not
- unreasonable for a default approach. For example, it might
- be appropriate for reporting certain kinds of ATTRIBUTE
- change such as state changes. However, this approach should
- be used VERY, VERY SPARINGLY if at all.
-
- The onAdditionalInformation field provides a place to put
- additional information otherwise lost in translation (e.g.,
- non-mandatory or multi-valued ATTRIBUTE values). The
- implementor should populate this field with self-defining
- information that can easily be understood by operations
- personnel.
-
- The onManagedObjectInstance variable is used in lieu of the
- ManagedObjectClass and ManagedObjectInstance parameters
- provided by CMIP.
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 28
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 2.13 Translation of Delete Operations
-
-
- 2.13.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- Nonetheless, it is highly useful to provide a means whereby
- a conceptual row may be removed from a table. In MIB-II,
- this was achieved by defining, for each conceptual row, an
- integer-value columnar object. If a management station sets
- the value of this object to some value, usually termed
- "invalid," then the effect is one of invalidating the
- corresponding row in the table. However, it is an
- implementation-specific matter as to whether an agent
- removes an invalidated entry from the table. Accordingly,
- management stations must be prepared to receive tabular
- information from agents that corresponds to entries not
- currently in use. Proper interpretation of such entries
- requires examination of the columnar object indicating the
- in-use status.
-
-
- 2.13.2 Discussion
-
- To simplify mechanized translation, the DELETE operation is
- provided for all tables, rather than trying to determine
- which ones support manager-initiated DELETE operations.
-
-
- 2.14 Translation of Create Operations
-
-
- 2.14.1 RFC 1212 Advice
-
- It is also highly useful to have a clear understanding of
- how a conceptual row may be added to a table. In Internet,
- at the protocol level, a management station issues an SNMP
- set operation containing an arbitrary set of variable
- bindings. In the case that an agent detects that one or
- more of those variable bindings refers to an object instance
- not currently available in that agent, it may, according to
- the rules of the SNMP, behave according to any of the
- following paradigms:
-
- (1) It may reject the SNMP set operation as referring to
- non-existent object instances by returning a response with
- the error-status field set to "noSuchName" and the error-
- index field set to refer to the first vacuous reference.
-
- (2) It may accept the SNMP set operation as requesting the
- creation of new object instances corresponding to each of
- the object instances named in the variable bindings. The
- value of each (potentially) newly created object instance is
- specified by the "value" component of the relevant variable
- binding. In this case, if the request specifies a value for
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 29
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- a newly (or previously) created object that it deems
- inappropriate by reason of value orsyntax, then it rejects
- the SNMP set operation by responding with the error-status
- field set to badValue and the error-index field set to refer
- to the first offending variable binding.
-
- (3) It may accept the SNMP set operation and create new
- object instances as described in (2) above and, in addition,
- at its discretion, create supplemental object instances to
- complete a row in a conceptual table of which the new object
- instances specified in the request may be a part.
-
- It should be emphasized that all three of the above
- behaviors are fully conformant to the SNMP specification and
- are fully acceptable, subject to any restrictions which may
- be imposed by access control and/or the definitions of the
- MIB objects themselves.
-
-
- 2.14.2 Additional Constraints
-
- Be very sparing in allowing Internet manager initiated
- object creation. A table of parents and a table of name
- bindings are provided in the ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB so
- that a parent can be specified when creating an object.
-
-
- 2.14.3 Discussion
-
- To create an object mapping into the ISO/CCITT world
- requires that its parent be known, hence the parent table.
- A child table is also provided to allow general navigation
- of the MIB tree. The name binding table is necessary to
- determine the object identifier associated with each
- parent/child binding.
-
- An SNMP SetRequest needs to contain enough information to
- create an internally consistent object from the ISO/CCITT
- perspective. The SNMP PDU size restriction could be a
- problem here.
-
-
- 3 Constraints on SNMP Usage
-
- The following constraints apply when using SNMP with a MIB
- translated by this procedure.
-
- Editor's Note: [In this draft, the term "SNMP" implies
- SNMPv1. Support for SNMPv2 is to be added in the next
- draft.]
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 30
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- 3.1 Approach
-
- The following assumptions about use of the SNMP are made to
- facilitate MIB translation:
-
- - The management station will expect that conditional
- attributes may not be present on a per conceptual row basis
- and will act appropriately, e.g., use GetNextRequest to test
- for presence.
-
- - The management station will expect that access actually
- granted may be less than stated in the MIB specification due
- to dynamic access controls; in such cases it may receive
- error-status of readOnly --- even for an SNMP GetRequest.
-
- - A management station creating a new entry in a class or
- side table must first acquire an appropriate index for doing
- so. This is accomplished by reading a value from the
- appropriate row of the ocNextUniqueIndexTable provided in
- the "ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB" (see Appendix B subsection
- 2). The index of this table is an object ID, i.e., the ID
- of one of the tables generated by this algorithm. The output
- (reading the ocNextUniqueIndex conceptual column of the
- indicated conceptual row) is a unique integer subidentifier
- to be used for creating a new conceptual row in the table of
- interest. Typically, a different value is returned each
- time an ocNextUniqueIndex column is read.
-
- The subidentifier returned by ocNextUniqueIndex is
- guaranteed to be unique within its table within an agent.
-
- - Creation of a class or side table entry requires that
- the associated SNMP SetRequest PDU include:
-
- * a valid pre-allocated subidentifier for that table,
-
- * initial values for those attributes that must be
- present (which however may be allowed to default). and
-
- * in the case of a class table entry, class entry
- instance of a valid parent object to be inserted in the
- parent table.
-
- If any of these conditions are not met, noSuchName
- error-status is returned.
-
- - If a management station attempts to delete an object
- or attribute value for which deletion is not permitted (for
- any reason) error-status of readOnly is returned.
-
- - A management station must be prepared to receive
- badValue error-status when a SetRequest operation attempts
- to set an attribute to a value inconsistent with other
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 31
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- attribute values according to the object's BEHAVIOR or
- PERMITTED VALUES specifications.
-
-
- 3.2 Discussion
-
- To support create operations requires that the manager
- somehow supply a unique subidentifier. Rather than sub-
- allocate index ranges to different managers or administer
- pools on a per-table basis, it seems simplest to have a
- generic pool administered by the agent on behalf of all
- managers.
-
- As regards error-status values, a "bending" of the rules of
- SNMP is necessary to map functionality not really supported
- in the protocol. Thus an off-the-shelf manager should be
- able to interoperate with an agent that implements a
- translated MIB but usage of the PDUs will not be entirely
- conventional. This is particularly true for usage of error-
- status.
-
-
- 4 Summary
-
- Given certain assumptions about the use of SNMP (section 3)
- and the ancillary ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB (appendix B),
- this procedure allows mechanized translation of most
- functionality found in ISO/CCITT MIBs to the world of SNMP.
-
- The algorithm preserves basic capability to navigate
- ISO/CCITT object relationships, i.e.,
-
- - Location of parents (immediately containing objects),
-
- - Location of children (immediately contained objects),
- and
-
- - Location of referenced objects.
-
- This approach preserves the capability to create new object
- instances and attribute values, even for generic network
- models that subsume multiple computer systems and network
- elements.
-
- Areas in which significant functionality is lost in
- translation include:
-
- - Notification: a minimalistic set of capabilities are
- provided for basic notifications in the ISO/CCITT
- Convergence MIB. No attempt is made to provide for
- filtering or logging of notifications.
-
- - Actions: these must be dealt with manually, on a case by
- case basis.
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 32
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- - Scoping and filtering: only rudimentary tools are
- provided for navigating the translated MIB's using SNMP.
-
-
- 5 Acknowledgments
-
- The editor wishes to express gratitude to Keith McCloghrie
- for his extremely timely and expert assistance with the U S
- West Trouble Administration translation effort, also, to Ken
- Hunter of Hewlett-Packard Company and Al Vincent of U S WEST
- Communications, Inc. who translated the MIB and made it
- work. These efforts served as input to the original
- contribution on which this document is based.
-
- In addition, the following individuals have contributed to
- this effort.
-
- Bob Aronoff - NIST
- Jon Biggar - NetLabs
- Mary Brady - NIST
- April Chang - NetLabs
- Jock Embry - Opening Technologies
- Paul Golick - IBM
- Pramod Kalyanas - University of Delaware
- Lee LaBarre - The MITRE Corporation
- David Liu - Northern Telecom, Inc
- Owen Newnan - U S West Advanced Technologies
- Steve Ng - MPR Teltech
- Yasuhiro Ohara - NTT
- George Pavlou - UCL
- Lisa Phifer - Bellcore
- Tom Rutt - AT&T
- Mark Smith - Hewlett-Packard
- Einar Stefferud - Network Management Associates, Inc.
- Dean Voiss - NetLabs
- Yoshi Yamashita - NKK Corporation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 33
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- References
-
- [ISO8824] ISO/IEC IS 8824: Information Technology- Open
- System Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax
- Notation One(ASN.1),1990.
-
- [ISO8825] ISO/IEC IS 8825: Information Technology - Open
- System Interconnection-Specification of Basic Encoding Rules
- for Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1),1990.
-
- [ISO7498-4] ISO/IEC IS 7498-4, Information Processing
- Systems - Open Systems Interconnection -Basic Reference
- Model Part 4 - Management Framework, 1989.
-
- [ISO9595] ISO/IEC IS 9595, Information Technology - Open
- System Interconnection- Common Management Information
- Service Definition, 1991.
-
- [ISO9596-1] ISO/IEC IS 9596-1, Information Technology - Open
- Systems Interconnection- Common Management Information
- Protocol - Part 1: Specification, 1991.
-
- [ISO10165-1] ISO/IEC IS 10165-1: Information Technology -
- Open Systems Interconnection - Structure of Management
- Information - Part 1: Management Information Model, 1991.
-
- [ISO10165-2] ISO/IEC IS 10165-2: Information Technology -
- Open Systems Interconnection -Structure of Management
- Information - Part 2: Definition of Management Information,
- 1992.
-
- [ISO10165-4] ISO/IEC IS 10165-4: Information Technology -
- Open Systems Interconnection -Structure of Management
- Information - Part 4: Guidelines for the Definition of
- Managed Objects, 1991.
-
- [RFC1052] RFC 1052, Cerf, V., IAB Recommendations for the
- Development of Internet Network Management Standards, April
- 1988.
-
- [RFC1109] RFC 1109, Cerf, V., Report of the Second Ad Hoc
- Network Management Review Group, August 1989.
-
- [RFC1155] RFC 1155, M. Rose and K. McCloghrie, Structure and
- Identification of Management Information for TCP/IP based
- internets, May 1990.
-
- [RFC1157] RFC 1157, J.D. Case, M.S. Fedor, M.L. Schoffstall,
- C. Davin, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), May
- 1990.
-
- [RFC1212] RFC1212, M. Rose, K. McCloghrie - Editors, Concise
- MIB Definitions, March 1991.
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 34
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- [RFC1213] Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets: MIB-
- II, March 1991.
-
- [RFC1214] RFC1214, L. LaBarre - editor, OSI Internet
- Management: Management Information Base, April 1991.
-
- [RFC1215] RFC1215, M. Rose - Editor, Management A convention
- for Defining Traps for use with the SNMP, March 1991.
-
- [RFC1353] RFC1353, K. McCloghrie, J.R. Davin, J.M. Galvin,
- Definitions of Managed Objects for SNMP Parties, July 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2COEX] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,
- S.L.Waldbusser, Coexistence between version 1 and version 2
- of the Internet Network Management Framework, Internet-
- draft, December 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2PROT] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,
- S.L.Waldbusser, Protocol Operations for version 2 of the
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-draft,
- January 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2SMI] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,
- S.L.Waldbusser, Structure of Management Information for
- version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
- (SNMPv2), Internet-draft, December 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2MIB] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,
- S.L.Waldbusser, Management Information Base for version 2 of
- the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-
- draft, December 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2TC] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,
- S.L.Waldbusser, Textual Conventions for version 2 of the
- Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-draft,
- December 1992.
-
- [SNMPv2ADMIN] J.R. Davin, J.M. Galvin, K.McCloghrie,
- Administrative Model for version 2 of the Simple Network
- Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-Draft, January 1993.
-
- [SNMPv2SEC] J.M. Galvin, K. McCloghrie, J.R. Davin, Security
- Protocols for version 2 of the Simple Network Management
- Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-Draft, January 1993.
-
- [SNMPv2TM] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose, S.L. Waldbusser,
- Transport Mappings for version 2 of the Simple Network
- Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-Draft, January 1993.
-
- [SNMPv2PARTY] J.D. Case, K. McCloghrie, M.T. Rose,S.L.
- Waldbusser, Party MIB for version 2 of the Simple Network
- Management Protocol (SNMPv2), Internet-Draft, January 1993.
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 35
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- [IIMCIMIBTRANS] ISO/CCITT and Internet Management
- Coexistence (IIMC): Translation of Internet MIBs to
- ISO/CCITT GDMO MIBs, Draft 1 March 26,1993.
-
- [IIMCMIB-II] ISO/CCITT and Internet Management Coexistence
- (IIMC): Translation of Internet MIB-II (RFC1213) to
- ISO/CCITT GDMO MIB, Draft 1, March 26, 1993.
-
- [IIMCPROXY] ISO/CCITT and Internet Management Coexistence
- (IIMC): ISO/CCITT to Internet Management Proxy, Draft 1,
- March, 1993 [to be distributed].
-
- [IIMCSEC] ISO/CCITT and Internet Management Coexistence
- (IIMC): ISO/CCITT to Internet Management Security, Draft 1,
- March 26, 1993.
-
- [NMFMC92] NM Forum and X/Open, ISO/CCITT and Internet
- Management: Coexistence and Interworking Strategy, October,
- 1992.
-
- [T1M192] ANSI T1M1.5, Operations, Administration and
- Provisioning (OAM&P)--- Services for Interfaces between
- Operations Systems across Jurisdictional Boundaries to
- support Fault Management --- Trouble Administration,
- T1LB.262R3-1991, January 13, 1992.
-
- [USWE92] U S WEST Communications, Inc., U S WEST Network
- Interface Specification--- MEDIACC Trouble Administration
- (TA), Document Number 77302,* Issue A, May 1992.
-
- * U S WEST Business Resources, Inc., Manager--- Information
- Release, 1801 California St., Room 1340, Denver CO 80202;
- 303 298 0117.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 36
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- Appendix A Abridged Example
-
- Following is a fairly brief example that illustrates some
- but not all aspects of the translation procedure.
-
- The reader can find a more comprehensive example of MIB
- translation in [T1M192] and [USWE92], from which
- specifications this abridged example is adapted. The
- reader will note that this example is highly abridged and
- differs in some other respects from those two
- specifications.
-
- Editor's Note: [This example is intended to be updated with
- an example that more fully illustrates these translation
- procedures (possibly another OMNIPoint 1 MIB, or, at
- minimum, the OMNIPoint 1 version of the ANSI T1M1 Trouble
- MIB).]
-
-
- A.1 Input ISO/CCITT Management Information Base
-
- troubleReport MANAGED OBJECT CLASS
- DERIVED FROM "T1M1":top; -- ANSI T1M1 variant of top
- CHARACTERIZED BY
- troubleReportPkg PACKAGE
- ATTRIBUTES
- cancelRequestedByManager GET-REPLACE
- DEFAULT VALUE
-
- TroubleModule.troubleReportCancelRequestedByManagerDefault,
- managedObjectInstance GET,
- receivedTime GET,
- troubleFound GET;
-
- NOTIFICATIONS
- "Rec. X.721 | ISO/IEC 10165-2 :
- 1992":objectCreation,
- "Rec. X.721 | ISO/IEC 10165-2 :
- 1992":objectDeletion,
- "T1LB-91-263R1":troubleHistoryEventNotification;;;
-
- CONDITIONAL PACKAGES
- troubleReportaccessTimeLocationListPkg PACKAGE
- ATTRIBUTES
- accessTimeLocationList GET-REPLACE;;
- PRESENT IF "an instance supports it.,",
-
- troubleReportperceivedTroubleSeverityPkg PACKAGE
- ATTRIBUTES
- perceivedTroubleSeverity GET-REPLACE;;
- PRESENT IF "an instance supports it.";
-
- REGISTERED AS { trMObjectClass 5};
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 37
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- accessTimeLocationList ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX
- TroubleModule.ServiceLocationList;
- BEHAVIOUR
- accessTimeLocationListBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Access Time Location list attribute identifies the set
- or subset of service locations for which the Location Access
- Hours attribute values are valid.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS { trAttribute 2};
-
- cancelRequestedByManager ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX
- TroubleModule.CancelRequestedByManager;
- MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
- BEHAVIOUR
- cancelRequestedByManagerBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Cancel Requested By Manager attribute indicates whether
- the manager has initiated the process to cancel a Trouble
- Report.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS {trAttribute 12};
-
- managedObjectInstance ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX
- TroubleModule.ManagedObjectInstance;
- MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
- BEHAVIOUR
- managedObjectInstanceBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Managed Object Instance attribute indicates the CNM
- Service object class instance or the GNM telecommunications
- network resource instance associated with a particular
- trouble report instance.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS {trAttribute 29};
-
- perceivedTroubleSeverity ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX
- TroubleModule.PerceivedTroubleSeverity;
- MATCHES FOR EQUALITY;
- BEHAVIOUR
- perceivedTroubleSeverityBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Perceived Trouble Severity attribute allows the manager
- to indicate the effect of the trouble on the managed object
- being reported.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS {trAttribute 32};
-
- receivedTime ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX TroubleModule.ReceivedTime;
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 38
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- MATCHES FOR ORDERING;
- BEHAVIOUR
- receivedTimeBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Received Time attribute indicates the date and time
- when a trouble report was entered.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS {trAttribute 33};
-
- troubleFound ATTRIBUTE
- WITH ATTRIBUTE SYNTAX TroubleModule.TroubleFound;
- BEHAVIOUR
- troubleFoundBehaviour BEHAVIOUR
- DEFINED AS
- "The Trouble Found attribute specifies an enumerated code
- value, which identifies the problem resolved. This field
- will be copied into the trouble history information.";
- ;
- REGISTERED AS {trAttribute 45};
-
-
-
- troubleHistoryEventNotification NOTIFICATION
- WITH INFORMATION SYNTAX
- TroubleModule.TroubleHistoryInfo;
- REGISTERED AS {trNotification 1};
-
-
-
- TroubleModule DEFINITIONS ::=
- -- TroubleModule {...troubleModule(x)}
- BEGIN
-
- IMPORTS
-
- AdditionalTroubleInfo,
- CancelRequestedByManger,
- CloseoutVerification,
- CommitmentTime,
- PerceivedTroubleSeverity,
- TroubleFound,
- TroubleReportNumberList,
- TroubleType FROM GNMTA
-
- ObjectInstance FROM CMIP-1 {joint-iso-ccitt
- ms(9) cmip(1) modules(0) protocol(3)};
-
- trMObjectClass OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
- usa(840) ansi-t1-227-1992(10015) trGNM(0) objectClass(3) }
-
- trAttribute OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
- usa(840) ansi-t1-227-1992(10015) trGNM(0) attribute(7) }
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 39
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- trNotification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2)
- usa(840) ansi-t1-228-1992(10016) trGNM(0) notification(10) }
-
- CancelRequestedByManager ::= BOOLEAN
- ManagedObjectInstance ::= ObjectInstance
- PerceivedTroubleSeverity ::= INTEGER {
- outOfService(0),
- backInService(1),
- serviceAffectingTrouble(2),
- nonServiceAffectingTrouble(3)
- }
- PremisesAddress ::= PrintableString(SIZE(128))
- PremisesName ::= PrintableString(SIZE(64))
- ReceivedTime ::= GeneralizedTime
- ServiceLocationList ::= SET OF SEQUENCE{
- PremisesName,
- PremisesAddress
- }
- TroubleFound ::= CHOICE{
- number INTEGER {
- pending(0),
- cameClear(1),
- centralOffice(2),
- customerPremisesEquipment(3),
- facility(4),
- interexchangeCarrier(5),
- information(6),
- nonplanClassified(7),
- noTroubleFound(8),
- station(9),
- servingBureau(10),
- testOK(11),
- publicServicesCoinSet(12),
- otherStationEquipment(13),
- stationWiring(14),
- centralOfficeFacility(15),
- customerOperatingInstructions(16),
- testedOKVerifiedOK(17),
- coFacilityTestedFoundOK(18),
- outsideFacilityTestedFoundOK(19),
- referredOutToOtherDept(20),
- protectiveConnectingArrang(21),
- cpeCustomerResponsibility(22)
- },
- identifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- }
- troubleReportCancelRequestedByManagerDefault BOOLEAN ::=
- FALSE
-
- -- Supporting Productions
-
- TroubleAdministrationFunctionalUnits ::= BIT STRING
- {
- fm-ta-kernel (0),
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 40
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- fm-ta-req-trb-rpt-format (1),
- fm-ta-trb-hist-evt- notif (2),
- fm-ta-rev-trb-hist-recd (3),
- fm-ta-add-trb-info (4),
- fm-ta-trb-rpt-up-notif (5),
- fm-ta-enrol-deenrol-notif (6),
- fm-ta-ver-trb-rep-comp (7),
- fm-ta-mod-trb-adm-info (8)
- }
-
- TroubleHistoryInfo ::= SEQUENCE{
- managedObjectInstance [0] ObjectInstance,
- receivedTime [1] GeneralizedTime,
- troubleFound [2] TroubleFound,
- additionalTroubleInfo [3] AdditionalTroubleInfo
- OPTIONAL,
- cancelRequestedByManager [4] CancelRequestedByManager
- OPTIONAL,
- closeOutNarr [5] PrintableString OPTIONAL,
- closeoutVerification [6] CloseoutVerification
- OPTIONAL,
- commitmentTime [7] CommitmentTime OPTIONAL,
- custTroubleTicketNumber [8] PrintableString
- OPTIONAL,
- perceivedTroubleSeverity [9] PerceivedTroubleSeverity
- OPTIONAL,
- restoredTime [10] GeneralizedTime OPTIONAL,
- troubleReportNumberList [11] TroubleReportNumberList
- OPTIONAL,
- troubleType [12] TroubleType OPTIONAL
- }
-
- END
-
-
-
- A.2 Output Internet MIB Macros
-
- T1MODULE DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
- IMPORTS OBJECT-TYPE, Counter FROM RFC1155-SMI;
-
-
- t1TATroubleReportTable OBJECT-TYPE
- -- class table
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF
- T1TATroubleReportTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "t1TATroubleReport class table."
- REFERENCE "trMObjectClass 5"
- ::= { t1TA 5 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 41
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- -- class (table) entry
- SYNTAX T1TATroubleReportTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "t1TATroubleReportTable instance"
- INDEX { t1TATroubleReportIndex
- }
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTable 1 }
-
- T1TATroubleReportTableEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
- t1TATroubleReportDelete
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportIndex
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportCancelRequestedByManager
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportManagedObjectInstance
- OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- t1TATroubleReportReceivedTime
- DisplayString,
- t1TATroubleReportTroubleFoundNumber
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportTroubleFoundIdentifier
- OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- t1TATroubleReportPerceivedTroubleSeverity
- INTEGER
- }
-
- t1TATroubleReportDelete OBJECT-TYPE
- -- class entry delete indicator
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS write-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "When set to zero, the corresponding entry of
- thet1TATroubleReportTable is deleted."
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 1
- }
-
- t1TATroubleReportIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- -- class entry index
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Distinguishes unique entries of
- t1TATroubleReportTable"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 2
- }
-
- -- Consistent with the current ANSI GNM, there are no
- -- attributes associated with TOP.
- -- there is one level of derivation for TroubleReport, arc
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 42
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- -- numbering commences at 2+10= 12 rounded up to the
- -- nearest multiple of ten, i.e., with arc number 20:
-
- t1TATroubleReportCancelRequestedByManager OBJECT-TYPE
- -- class table conceptual column
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Cancel Requested By Manager attribute indicates whether
- the manager has initiated the process to cancel a Trouble
- Report."
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 12"
- -- the following corresponds to a DEFAULT
- -- VALUE OF
- --
- troubleReportCancelRequestedByManagerDefault
- -- BOOLEAN ::= FALSE DEFVAL { 0 }
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 20 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportManagedObjectInstance OBJECT-TYPE
- -- recall that ObjectInstance maps to class entry instance
-
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Managed Object Instance attribute indicates the CNM
- Service object class instance or the GNM telecommunications
- network resource instance associated with a particular
- trouble report instance."
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 29"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 21 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportReceivedTime OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Received Time attribute indicates the date and time
- when a trouble report was entered."
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 33"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 22 }
-
- -- Note that t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList is not
- -- assigned arc 23 because it is implemented as a side table
- -- due to its multivalued, complex syntax; see below.
-
- -- Exactly one of the following two choices will be present
- -- for a given table entry. These are enumerated in-line (in
- -- the class table) rather than in a side table because the
- -- syntax cannot be multi-valued.
-
- t1TATroubleReportTroubleFoundNumber OBJECT-TYPE
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 43
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- pending(32767),-- value of zero not permitted
- cameClear(1),
- centralOffice(2),
- customerPremisesEquipment(3),
- facility(4),
- interexchangeCarrier(5),
- information(6),
- nonplanClassified(7),
- noTroubleFound(8),
- station(9),
- servingBureau(10),
- testOK(11),
- publicServicesCoinSet(12),
- otherStationEquipment(13),
- stationWiring(14),
- centralOfficeFacility(15),
- customerOperatingInstructions(16),
- testedOKVerifiedOK(17),
- coFacilityTestedFoundOK(18),
- outsideFacilityTestedFoundOK(19),
- referredOutToOtherDept(20),
- protectiveConnectingArrang(21),
- cpeCustomerResponsibility(22)
- }
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Trouble Found attribute specifies an enumerated code
- value, which identifies the problem resolved. This field
- will be copied into the trouble history information."
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 45"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 23}
-
- t1TATroubleReportTroubleFoundIdentifier OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Trouble Found attribute specifies an enumerated code
- value, which identifies the problem resolved. This field
- will be copied into the trouble history information."
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 45"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 24}
-
- t1TATroubleReportPerceivedTroubleSeverity OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- outOfService(32767),
- backInService(1),
- serviceAffectingTrouble(2),
- nonServiceAffectingTrouble(3)
- }
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 44
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Perceived Trouble Severity attribute allows the manager
- to indicate the effect of the trouble on the managed object
- being reported"
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 32"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportTableEntry 25}
-
- -- the following is a side table because it is translated
- -- from a multi-valued attribute:
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTable OBJECT-TYPE
- -- side table
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF
-
- T1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
-
- -- this attribute is in a conditional package
- -- thus the table may be empty
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "The Access Time Location list attribute identifies the set
- or subset of service locations for which the Location
- Access Hours attribute values are valid."
-
- REFERENCE "trAttribute 2"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReport 2 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry OBJECT-
- TYPE
- -- side table entry
-
- SYNTAX
- T1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
-
- "t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTable entry."
- INDEX {
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListClassIndex,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListValueIndex
- }
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTable 1 }
-
- T1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry
- ::= SEQUENCE {
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListDelete
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListClassIndex
- INTEGER,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListValueIndex
- INTEGER,
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 45
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListPremisesName
- DisplayString,
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListPremisesAddress
- DisplayString
- }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListDelete OBJECT-TYPE
- -- side table delete indication
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS write-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "When set to zero, the corresponding entry of the access
- timelocation list table is deleted."
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry 1 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListClassIndex OBJECT-
- TYPE
- -- side table class index
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Has same value as class entry index of managed object."
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry 2 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListValueIndex OBJECT-
- TYPE
- -- side table value index
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Uniquely discriminates a value of
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationList within a managed
- object"
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry 3 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListPremisesName
- OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "The access time for a service location list premises name."
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry 20 }
-
- t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListPremisesAddress
- OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 46
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- "The access time for a service location list premises
- address."
- ::= { t1TATroubleReportAccessTimeLocationListTableEntry 21 }
-
- END
-
-
-
-
-
- Appendix B ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB
-
- This appendix has two subsections (parts):
-
- (1) Translation of DMI Notifications to Traps. An
- informative part that explains how (to what extent) standard
- Definition of Management Information (ISO/IEC IS 10165-2)
- notifications are mapped to SNMP traps. This example
- provides guidance as to how other traps might be mapped,
- although that should be avoided where possible.
-
- (2) ISO/CCITT Convergence--- ASN.1 Definitions. A normative
- part that provides the translated MIB developed per part
- (1).
-
-
- B.1. Translation of DMI Notifications to Traps
-
- This subsection documents the translation of DMI
- notifications to traps per steps described in subsection
- 2.12.
-
- The decisions per step (1) are to select the output subtrees
- onSMI2toInternetNotification and
- onSMI2toInternetAttributeID, and the prefix "on".
-
- Table B-1 reflects the listing of notifications per the
- procedures of step (2). The abbreviations used for
- mandatory attributes in this table are defined in Table B-2.
-
- Table B-2 itself provides the mapping of ISO/CCITT syntaxes
- to fixed and scalar types per step (3). This illustrates
- the complexity of the problem and need for human judgment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 47
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- --------------------------------------------------------
- leg notification syntax mandatory
- attributes
- --------------------------------------------------------
- 1 attributeValue- AttributeValue- avcd
- Change ChangeInfo
- 2 communicationsAlarm AlarmInfo pc,ps
- 3 environmentalAlarm AlarmInfo pc,ps
- 4 equipmentAlarm AlarmInfo pc,ps
- 5 integrityViolation SecurityAlarmInfo sac,sas,sad,
- su,spv
- 6 objectCreation ObjectInfo (none)
- 7 objectDeletion ObjectInfo (none)
- 8 operational- SecurityAlarmInfo sac,sas,sad,
- Violation su,spv
- 9 physicalViolation SecurityAlarmInfo sac,sas,sad,
- su,spv
- 10 processingErrorAlarm AlarmInfo pc,ps
- 11 qualityOfServiceAlarm AlarmInfo pc,ps
- 12 relationshipChange Relationship- rcd
- ChangeInfo
- 13 securityServiceOr- SecurityAlarmInfo sac,sas,sad,
- MechanismViolation su,spv
- 14 stateChange StateChangeInfo scd
- 15 timeDomainViolation SecurityAlarmInfo sac,sas,sad,
- su,spv
- -------------------------------------------------
- Figure B-1. DMI Notifications
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 48
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- -------------------------------------------------
- leg abbreviation
- attribute identifier/syntax resolves to
- -------------------------------------------------
- 10 avci
- attributeValueChangeDefinition/AttributeValueChangeDefinition
-
- 18 pc
- probableCause/ProbableCause
-
- 17 ps
- perceivedSeverity/PerceivedSeverity
-
- 20 rcd
- relationshipChangeDefinition/AttributeValueChangeDefinition
-
- 21 sac
- securityAlarmCause/ProbableCause
-
- 22 sad
- securityAlarmDetector/SecurityAlarmDetector
-
- 23 sas
- securityAlarmSeverity/SecurityAlarmSeverity
-
- 28 scd
- stateChangeDefinition/AttributeValueChangeDefinitiion
-
- 24 spv
- serviceProvider/ServiceUser
-
- 25 su
- serviceUser/ServiceUser
- -------------------------------------------------
- Figure B-2. Mandatory Attributes
-
-
- The latter half of subsection B.2 provides the output of
- steps (4) and (5).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 49
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- --------------------------------------------------------
- The format of this table is as follows:
- < identifier > ::= < OSI Syntax >
- => < resulting SNMP Syntax >
- [Comments]
- --------------------------------------------------------
- AttributeValueChangeDefinition::=SET OF SEQUENCE {
- attributeID AttributeId,
- oldAttributeValue
- [1] ANY DEFINED BY attributeID OPTIONAL,
- newAttributeValue [2] ANY DEFINED BY attributeID}
- => OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- [Maps to OBJECT IDENTIFIER for conceptual row of ATTRIBUTE
- within class table or of side table. The oldAttributeValue
- is optional thus not supported. The new value can be gotten
- through polling.]
- --------------------------------------------------------
- PerceivedSeverity ::= ENUMERATED{ indeterminate(0),
- critical (1), major (2), minor (3), warning (4),
- cleared (5) }
- => INTEGER
- [Enumerated values are carried over except that zero maps to
- 32767.]
- --------------------------------------------------------
- ProbableCause ::= CHOICE {
- globalValue OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- localValue INTEGER}
- => OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- [The localValue is option is supported by suffixing the
- integer value to the special OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- onSMI2toInternetIntegerForm.]
- --------------------------------------------------------
- SecurityAlarmDetector::= CHOICE {
- mechanism [0] OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- object [1] ObjectInstance,
- application [2] AE-title}
- => OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- [ObjectInstance maps to OID (class entry instance ) and
- mechanism OID is passed through unaltered; there is no
- ambiguity between the two. AE Title is an alien construct
- to the internet community. This option should be supported
- via an empty OID and descriptive text in the
- ocAdditionalInformation variable.]
- --------------------------------------------------------
- ServiceUser ::= SEQUENCE {
- identifier OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- details ANY DEFINED BY identifier }
- => DisplayString
- [ANYs are deprecated for SNMP. A text string provides a
- reasonable way to map this general notion.]
- -------------------------------------------------Figure B-3.
- Mapping of ISO/CCITT Syntaxes to Scalars
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 50
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- B.2 ISO/CCITT Convergence--- ASN.1 Definitions
-
- ISOCCITTCONVERGENCE DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
- IMPORTS OBJECT-TYPE, Counter FROM RFC1155-SMI;
-
- -- Following is an ISO/CCITT Convergence MIB.
- -- The purpose of this MIB is to
- -- facilitate ISO/CCITT GDMO to Internet MIB translation.
- -- It has two primary features:
-
- -- (1) Relationship Management Convergence Group:
- -- Parent, child and other tables that facilitate
- -- navigation of containment relationships. These
- -- objects belong to one managed object group
- -- that must be supported by any agent for which
- -- conformance to this specification is claimed.
-
- -- (2) Mapping of common notifications to traps. Each trap
- -- listed is a separate unit of conformance and thus its
- -- own object group.
-
- -- *********************************************************
- -- Relationship Management Convergence Group
- -- *********************************************************
-
- -- The following table enables manager creation of
- -- class entry instances:
-
- -- Editor's Note: [The object ocNextLocallyUniqueIndex
- -- and ocNextLocallyUniqueIndex have been replaced in
- -- this draft with the ocNextUniqueIndexTable, which
- -- allows the agent to allocate indices on a per-class
- -- basis. Thus the manager need not determine whether
- -- a class is implemented locally or globally.
- -- Reviewer comment on this approach would be
- -- appreciated.]
-
- ocNextUniqueIndexTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF OcNextUniqueIndexEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides a class table or side table index for purposes of
- manager-initiated creation of rows in tables (i.e., new
- managed object instances or new values for multi-valued
- attributes). Successive reads to this table return
- different values that are unique within the scope of the
- table within the agent. Such values are assigned
- arbitrarily by the agent, so a manager should make no
- assumption about the
- sequence or magnitude of values which will be returned."
- ::= { ocObjectCreation 1 }
-
- ocNextUniqueIndexEntry OBJECT-TYPE
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 51
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- SYNTAX OcNextUniqueIndexEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Entry of ocNextUniqueIndexTable."
- INDEX { ocNextUniqueIndexIndex }
- ::= { ocNextUniqueIndexTable 1 }
-
- OcNextUniqueIndexEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ocNextUniqueIndexIndex OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ocNextUniqueIndex INTEGER
- }
-
- ocNextUniqueIndexIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the class or side table ID of the table for which
- a conceptual row is to be created."
- ::= { ocNextUniqueIndexEntry 1 }
-
- ocNextUniqueIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Returns the next index to be used for creation of a
- conceptual row in the indicated table. This read-only
- object
- returns different values each time it is read."
- ::= { ocNextUniqueIndexEntry 2 }
-
-
- -- Following is the parent table;
- -- given the class table entry of an
- -- object, it yields the class table entry for that
- -- object's parent (immediately containing) object.
-
- ocParentTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF OcParentTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Allows parents in the ISO/CCITT Management naming hierarchy
- to be determined.
- INDEX is OBJECT IDENTIFIER, i.e., class entry instance ."
- ::= { ocObjectCreation 2 }
-
- ocParentTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OcParentTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 52
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "Entry of parent table."
- INDEX { ocParent }
- ::= { ocParentTable 1 }
-
- OcParentTableEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- ocParentTableIndex OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ocParent OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- }
-
- ocParentTableIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the class table entry of the object in question."
- ::= { ocParentTableEntry 1 }
-
- ocParent OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the class table entry of the parent. A manager
- can only set this value when creating a new instance of a
- managed object class, and only for those object classes for
- which manager-initiated instance creation is allowed. An
- empty value is returned for TOP."
- ::= { ocParentTableEntry 2 }
-
- -- Following is the child table; given the class table
- -- instance of an object, it yields a list of class table
- -- instances for objects immediately subordinate to that
- -- object.
-
- ocChildTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF OcChildTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Allows children in the ISO/CCITT Management naming
- hierarchy to be determined."
- ::= { ocObjectCreation 3 }
-
- ocChildTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OcChildTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Entry of Child table."
- INDEX { ocParentOfChild, ocChild }
- ::= { ocChildTable 1 }
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 53
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- OcChildTableEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
- ocParentOfChild OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ocChild INTEGER
- }
-
- ocParentOfChild OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the class table entry of the parent."
- ::= { ocChildTableEntry 1 }
-
- ocChild OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-only
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This parameter is typically used in conjunction with a get
- next operation to acquire class table entries for successive
- child (contained) objects, given the parent. If this value
- is zero, the first child in the list is returned. If it
- is a class prefix, the first child in the given class is
- returned. If it is the full class table entry, the class
- table entry of the next higher child is returned. "
- ::= {ocChildTableEntry 2}
-
- -- Following is the NAME BINDING table. It allows the NAME
- -- BINDING OBJECT IDENTIFIER of an object instance to be
- -- gotten or set (can be set only on object creation).
-
- ocNameBindingTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF OcNameBindingTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Allows the NAME BINDING registration to be specified on
- object creation, or fetched for an existing class entry
- instance.."
- ::= { ocObjectCreation 4 }
-
- ocNameBindingTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OcNameBindingTableEntry
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Entry of name binding table."
- INDEX { ocObjectBound } -- class entry instance
- ::= { ocNameBindingTable 1 }
-
- OcNameBindingTableEntry::= SEQUENCE{
- ocObjectBound OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- ocNameBindingRegistry OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- }
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 54
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
-
- ocObjectBound OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the class entry instance of the object in
- question."
- ::= { ocNameBindingTableEntry 1 }
-
- ocNameBindingRegistry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS read-write
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "Provides the Name binding registration on object creation
- and can also be fetched. A manager can only set this value
- when creating a new instance of a managed object class, and
- only for those object classes for which manager-initiated
- instance creation is allowed."
- ::= { ocNameBindingTableEntry 2 }
-
-
-
- -- *********************************************************
- -- Managed Object Groups and Trap for DMI Notifications
- -- *********************************************************
-
- -- Following are SNMP mappings of the standard DMI
- -- NOTIFICATIONS. Each of these traps and OBJECT-TYPES
- -- may be implemented independent of the others,
- -- thus constituting its own managed object group.
-
- -- It is recommended these mappings to traps be used
- -- very sparingly. Where their use
- -- is necessary, the following "standard"
- -- traps be used where applicable:
-
- onAttributeValueChange TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onAttributeValueChangeDefinition
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report changes
- to the attribute such as addition or deletion of
- members to one or more set valued attributes,
- replacement of the value of one or more attributes
- and setting attribute values to their defaults."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 1"
- ::= 1
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 55
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- onCommunicationsAlarm TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onProbableCause,
- onPerceivedSeverity
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report when the
- object detects a communications error."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 2"
- ::= 2
-
- onEnvironmentalAlarm TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onProbableCause,
- onPerceivedSeverity
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report a
- problem in the environment."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 3"
- ::= 3
-
- onEquipmentAlarm TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onProbableCause,
- onPerceivedSeverity
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report a
- failure in the equipment."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 4"
- ::= 4
-
- onIntegrityViolation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onSecurityAlarmCause,
- onSecurityAlarmDetector,
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity,
- onServiceProvider,
- onServiceUser
- }
- DESCRIPTION
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 56
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- "This notification is used to report that a
- potential interruption in information flow
- has occurred such that information may have been
- illegally modified, inserted or deleted"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 5"
- ::= 5
-
- onObjectCreation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES{
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report the
- creation of a managed object to another
- open system."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 6"
- ::= 6
-
- onObjectDeletion TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES{
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report the
- deletion of a managed object to another
- open system."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 7"
- ::= 7
-
- onOperationalViolation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onSecurityAlarmCause,
- onSecurityAlarmDetector,
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity,
- onServiceProvider,
- onServiceUser
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification is used to report that the
- provision of the requested service was not
- possible due to the unavailability, malfunction or
- incorrect invocation of the service"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 8"
- ::= 8
-
- onPhysicalViolation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 57
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onSecurityAlarmCause,
- onSecurityAlarmDetector,
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity,
- onServiceProvider,
- onServiceUser
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification is used to report that a
- physical resource has been violated in a way
- that indicates a potential security attack"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 9"
- ::= 9
-
- onProcessingErrorAlarm TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onProbableCause,
- onPerceivedSeverity
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report processing
- failure in a managed object."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 10"
- ::= 10
-
- onQualityOfServiceAlarm TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onProbableCause,
- onPerceivedSeverity
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report a failure
- in the quality of service of the managed object."
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2:
- smi2Notification 11"
- ::= 11
-
- onRelationshipChange TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onRelationshipChangeDefinition
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 58
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- the change in the value of a relationship
- attributes of a managed object, that result
- through either internal operation of the managed object
- or via management operation."
- -- This is a subset of ISO/CCITT functionality and
- -- has been edited accordingly.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 12"
- ::= 12
-
- onSecurityServiceOrMechanismViolation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onSecurityAlarmCause,
- onSecurityAlarmDetector,
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity,
- onServiceProvider,
- onServiceUser
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification is used to report that a
- security attack has been detected by a security service
- or mechanism"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 13"
- ::= 13
-
- onStateChange TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onStateChangeDefinition
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification type is used to report the change in
- the value of a state attribute of a managed object,
- that result through either internal operation of
- the managed object or via management operation."
- -- This is a subset of ISO/CCITT functionality and
- -- the description accordingly has been manually
- -- edited.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 14"
- ::= 14
-
- onTimeDomainViolation TRAP-TYPE
- ENTERPRISE onSMI2toInternetNotification
- VARIABLES {
- onManagedObjectInstance,
- onAdditionalText,
- onSecurityAlarmCause,
- onSecurityAlarmDetector,
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity,
- onServiceProvider,
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 59
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- onServiceUser
- }
- DESCRIPTION
- "This notification is used to report that an
- event has occurred at an unexpected or prohibited time"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2Notification 15"
- ::= 15
-
-
- -- The following objects are not accessible and exist only
- -- for purposes of mapping ISO/CCITT
- -- DMI attributes to the VARIABLES of traps.
-
- -- These objects map several kinds of DMI ATTRIBUTEs
- -- relating to NOTIFICATIONs:
-
- -- Every DMI ATTRIBUTE that is mandatory for some
- -- NOTIFICATION.
-
- -- ATTRIBUTEs eventTime and managedObjectInstance,
- -- which are always provided by CMIP.
-
- -- ATTRIBUTE additionalText, which is listed in the
- -- VARIABLES parameter for all translated
- -- NOTIFICATIONs, even though it is generally
- -- optional in ISO/CCITT usage. This allows
- -- additional information to be conveyed that might
- -- otherwise be lost when translating to SNMP
-
- -- In the DESCRIPTION clauses of these objects, the term
- -- "attribute" is used synonomously with corresponding
- -- SNMP trap VARIABLEs.
-
- onAdditionalText OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- -- Editor's Note: [Should this be OCTET STRING?
- -- The ISO form is GraphicString.]
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute is used to specify additional
- textual information in NOTIFICATIONs "
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 7"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 7}
-
- onAttributeValueChangeDefinition OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute contains the OBJECT IDENTIFIER of
- an ATTRIBUTE whose change has been detected."
- -- This is a subset of ISO/CCITT functionality, as
- -- discussed in the informational part of this annex.
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 60
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- -- The description clause is therefore entered manually
- -- rather than copied verbatim.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 10"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 10}
-
- onPerceivedSeverity OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER
- -- indeterminate (32767), critical (1), major (2),
- -- minor (3), warning (4), cleared (5)
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION ""
- -- no ISO/CCITT BEHAVIOR description exists
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 17"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 17}
-
- onProbableCause OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION ""
- -- no ISO/CCITT BEHAVIOR description exists
- -- defined in ISO 10164-4
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 18"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 18}
-
- onRelationshipChangeDefinition OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute provides the OBJECT IDENTIFIER for
- a relationship ATTRIBUTE that has changed."
- -- This is a subset of ISO/CCITT functionality, as
- -- discussed in the informational part of this annex.
- -- The description clause is therefore entered manually
- -- rather than copied verbatim.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 20"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 20}
-
- onSecurityAlarmCause OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute specifies the cause of the
- security alarm"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 21"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 21}
-
- onSecurityAlarmDetector OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 61
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute identifies the entity that
- detected the security alarm"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 22"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 22}
-
- onSecurityAlarmSeverity OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute indicates the severity of the
- security alarm"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 23"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 23}
-
- onServiceProvider OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute contains information about the
- service provider associated with the service request
- that caused the security alarm"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 24"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 24}
-
- onServiceUser OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX DisplayString
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute contains information about the
- service user associated with the service request that
- caused the security alarm"
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 25"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 25}
-
- onStateChangeDefinition OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION
- "This attribute contains the OBJECT IDENTIFIER of
- a state ATTRIBUTE that has changed."
- -- This is a subset of ISO/CCITT functionality, as
- -- discussed in the informational part of this annex.
- -- The description clause is therefore entered manually
- -- rather than copied verbatim.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 28"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 28}
-
- onManagedObjectInstance OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER -- class entry instance
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 62
-
-
- Draft Translation of ISO/CCITT MIBs to Internet MIBs 3/26/93
-
-
- ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS mandatory
- DESCRIPTION ""
- -- Provides class entry instance (managed object
- -- instance) of the object issuing the notification.
- -- This is used in lieu of the CMIP ManagedObjectClass
- -- and ManagedObjectInstance parameters.
- REFERENCE "ISO 10165-2: smi2AttributeID 61"
- ::= {onSMI2toInternetAttributeID 61}
-
-
- -- This document is allocated the following
- -- registration identifier for purposes of referencing
- -- material contained herein.
-
- iimcOMIBTRANS OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- {iimcManagementDocMan 5}
-
- -- Editor's Note: [The iimcManagementDocMan will be
- -- resolved before the final publication of this
- -- document.]
-
- -- Editor's Note: [The following arcs assignments
- -- have been fabricated in order to check syntax of
- -- this module. It is anticipated the NMF will
- -- register appropriate arcs upon approval of this
- -- specification.]
-
- onSMI2toInternetAttributeID OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- { iimcOMIBTRANS 1 }
- onSMI2toInternetNotification OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- { iimcOMIBTRANS 2 }
- onSMI2toInternetIntegerForm OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- { iimcOMIBTRANS 3 }
- ocObjectCreation OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- { iimcOMIBTRANS 4 }
-
- -- supplies integer form via object ID, the integer
- -- provided as the leg immediately subordinate to
- -- this subtree.
-
- END
-
-
-
- INTERNET DRAFT - EXPIRES AUGUST 27, 1993
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Newnan Expires August 27, 1993 Page 63
-